Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 21.06.2025 16:35
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Omada Health Shares Soar After IPO as GLP-1 Drugs Fuel Interest - WSJ
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Wall Street sets Palantir stock price for next 12 months - Finbold
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
The President Is Dead (In Helldivers 2) - Kotaku
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
What’s next?
FAMU AD accused of stealing $24K from old job - ESPN
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Who are your 10 best visuals in K-pop?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Thank you.